Bryan v. Mundy's Administrator
This text of 17 Mo. 556 (Bryan v. Mundy's Administrator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The question presented for consideration in this case is, whether an administrator can rely on the bar of three years provided in our administration law, against a demand which has not been presented for allowance for more than three years after the grant of letters of administration, when the administrator has failed to commence the publication of notice that administration has been granted on the estate, within thirty days after the letters are issued.
It has been repeatedly held by this court, that this bar of three years, which is independent of the general statute of [558]*558limitations, can only avail the administrator when he has given the notice in the manner and within the time prescribed by law. Wiggins v. Lovering’s Administrator, 9 Mo. Rep. 262. Montelius & Fuller v. Sarpy, administrator of Chouteau, 11 Mo. Rep. 237. Blackwell’s Administrator v. Ridenhour, 13 Mo. Rep. 125. It is not proper to consider this question longer open.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 Mo. 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryan-v-mundys-administrator-mo-1853.