Bryan v. McGee

4 F. Cas. 509, 2 Wash. C. C. 337
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania·Decided October 15, 1808·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BY THE COURT. The demurrer must be overruled. The defendant, having property in his hands belonging to the estate of Davis McGee, may, in equity, be called upon for that property in any place. But upon the plea, (which already stands for an answer) and the answer, it is the opinion of the court, upon the merits, that the complainants are entitled to a decree for the amount of assets admitted by the defendant to be in his hands. As to the goods charged in the bill to have been unfairly obtained from the intestate, the whole weight of evidence is in [510] favour of the defendant The answer is not •only not contradicted by evidence, but is strongly supported.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryan v. McGee, 4 F. Cas. 509, 2 Wash. C. C. 337 (circtdpa 1808).

4 F. Cas. 509 (Bryan v. McGee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Laughlin v. Solomon
36 A. 704 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)