Bryan v. Johnson

Texas Commission of Appeals

Bryan v. Johnson

259 S.W. 1116, 1924 Tex. App. LEXIS 1403

CourtTexas Commission of Appeals

DecidedApril 2, 1924

DocketNo. 435-3860

StatusPublished

This text of 259 S.W. 1116 (Bryan v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bryan v. Johnson, 259 S.W. 1116, 1924 Tex. App. LEXIS 1403 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

STAYTON, J.

The parties in this cause have 'entered into and filed with the clerk the following written agreement: “Come now plaintiff in error E. R. Bryan, and defendants in error Ruby Bryan Johnson and E. E., Johnson, by their attorneys of record, and respectfully show to your honors that they have agreed upon a compromise of this case, and have settled same upon the following terms: Plaintiff in error, E. R. Bryan, to have one-half of the land and money herein involved and to pay one-half of the costs of this litigation, and. defendant in error Ruby Bryan Johnson to have one-half of said land and money involved and to pay one-half of the costs of this litigation, and this cause to be withdrawn 'from court, and judgment entered dismissing same. Wherefore they pray that judgment may be entered, and that this cause may be dismissed.” We recommend that judgment be entered dismissing such cause from the Supreme Court in accordance with the foregoing agreement, and that in such judgment the plaintiff in error, E. R. Bryan, be adjudged to pay one-half of the costs .of the cause, and the defendant in error Ruby Bryan Johnson be adjudged to pay the remainder of such costs.

CURETON, C. J.

Cause dismissed, and costs apportioned as recommended by the Commission of Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STAYTON, J.

The parties in this cause have 'entered into and filed with the clerk the following written agreement: “Come now plaintiff in error E. R. Bryan, and defendants in error Ruby Bryan Johnson and E. E., Johnson, by their attorneys of record, and respectfully show to your honors that they have agreed upon a compromise of this case, and have settled same upon the following terms: Plaintiff in error, E. R. Bryan, to have one-half of the land and money herein involved and to pay one-half of the costs of this litigation, and. defendant in error Ruby Bryan Johnson to have one-half of said land and money involved and to pay one-half of the costs of this litigation, and this cause to be withdrawn 'from court, and judgment entered dismissing same. Wherefore they pray that judgment may be entered, and that this cause may be dismissed.” We recommend that judgment be entered dismissing such cause from the Supreme Court in accordance with the foregoing agreement, and that in such judgment the plaintiff in error, E. R. Bryan, be adjudged to pay one-half of the costs .of the cause, and the defendant in error Ruby Bryan Johnson be adjudged to pay the remainder of such costs.

CURETON, C. J.

Cause dismissed, and costs apportioned as recommended by the Commission of Appeals.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 S.W. 1116, 1924 Tex. App. LEXIS 1403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryan-v-johnson-texcommnapp-1924.