Bryan v. Henderson Hardware Co.

65 So. 242, 107 Miss. 255
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1914·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Reed, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

.The trial court erred in holding that the enrolled judgment against J. J. Dockery and in favor of appellee was, under the statute (section 819, Code 1906) a lien against an indebtedness owing by Monroe county to Dockery, and that the amount of the indebtedness paid by the county into the court should be applied on the judgment in a proceedings on a writ of garnishment, issued subsequent to the giving by Dockery of orders on the county in favor of appellants and the due presentation thereof, rather [265]*265than to the payment of the orders. The lien of the statute does not extend to cover the right to receive or recover a debt.

Reversed, and judgment here for appellants.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryan v. Henderson Hardware Co., 65 So. 242, 107 Miss. 255 (Mich. 1914).

65 So. 242 (Bryan v. Henderson Hardware Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Greenville Riverboat, LLC v. Less, Getz & Lipman, P.L.L.C.
131 F. Supp. 2d 842 (S.D. Mississippi, 2000)
Simmons v. Thomas
827 F. Supp. 397 (S.D. Mississippi, 1993)
Haynes v. First United Bank
133 B.R. 783 (N.D. Mississippi, 1991)
William Iselin & Co., Inc. v. Delta Auction
433 So. 2d 911 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1983)
Simmons-Belk, Inc. v. May
283 So. 2d 592 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1973)
Shuptrine v. Natalbany Lumber Co.
198 So. 24 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1940)
Beckett v. McCaslin
137 So. 519 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1931)
Bank of Monticello v. L. D. Powell Co.
130 So. 292 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1930)
R. F. Walden & Co. v. Yates
71 So. 897 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)