Bryan v. Defense Technology U.S.

Fourth Circuit

Bryan v. Defense Technology U.S.

466 F. App'x 208

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 22, 2012·No. No. 11-7336·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

T. Terell Bryan appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryan v. Defense Tech. US, No. 1:10-cv-02834-TLW, 2011 WL 4435579 (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

T. Terell Bryan appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryan v. Defense Tech. US, No. 1:10-cv-02834-TLW, 2011 WL 4435579 (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bryan v. Defense Technology U.S., 466 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

466 F. App'x 208 (Bryan v. Defense Technology U.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related