Bryan v. Beckley
This text of 16 Ky. 100 (Bryan v. Beckley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
WE are of opinion, that a correct exposition of the former opinion and decree of this court, requires that Beckley’s line, which is designated as running N. 20 E. 460 poles, should be run by making a due allowance for the variation of the magnetic, from the true meridian, from the time the survey was made until the present. This variation is reported by the surveyor to [101]*101be three degrees and thirty minutes; and, consequently, the course of that line should have been N. 16 1-2 E. according to the present magnetic meridian, instead of N. 20 E. as the court below decreed it should be run.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Ky. 100, 1 Litt. Sel. Cas. 100, 1814 Ky. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryan-v-beckley-kyctapp-1814.