Bryan T. Robinson v. State
This text of 256 So. 3d 217 (Bryan T. Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
BRYAN THOMAS ROBINSON,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-4227
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed July 20, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Glendon George Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Bryan Thomas Robinson was charged by indictment with the first-degree
premeditated murder of Stephen Gorney (Count One), robbery with a deadly weapon
(Count Two), and dealing in stolen property (Counts Three and Four). Robinson was
under the age of eighteen at the time of the offense. He was tried jointly with his codefendant, Tyzick Joseph Wall, before a jury. Robinson was found guilty as charged
on all four counts. He was sentenced to concurrent life terms on Counts One and Two
and to two consecutive fifteen-year terms on Counts Three and Four. Robinson was also
ordered to pay, among other costs, $200 in prosecution and investigative costs, $300 in
public defender costs and fees, and the $50 public defender application fee. Separately,
the State Attorney's Office for the Fifth Judicial Circuit was awarded $5736.40 in
restitution for additional prosecution costs incurred for trial witness travel expenses and
expert witness fees.
We affirm Robinson's convictions and sentences on all counts without further
discussion.1 However, we reverse the restitution order that awarded the State Attorney's
Office $5736.40 and remand for the inclusion of this amount in the costs order in addition
to the existing $200 line item for prosecution and investigative costs. See §§
775.089(1)(c)1., 938.27(8), Fla. Stat. (2015). We also reverse the inclusion of public
defender fees and costs in the cost order in excess of $100 in public defender fees and
costs and the $50 application fee because documentation supporting a greater amount
is not present in the record. See §§ 27.52(1)(b), 938.29(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2015); Alexis v.
State, 211 So. 3d 81, 83 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017); Simmons v. State, 24 So. 3d 636, 638 (Fla.
2d DCA 2009). We remand with instructions that public defender fees and costs be
reduced to $100 and the $50 application fee or to hold a hearing with notice to obtain
1We reject Robinson's argument that he is entitled to be resentenced on Count One pursuant to Williams v. State, 242 So. 3d 280, 288-89 (Fla. 2018) (citing Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99, 115 (2013)). Unlike the situation in Williams, Robinson was only charged with first-degree premeditated murder, and so the jury's guilty verdict contains an inherent unambiguous finding of intent to kill.
2 evidence from the public defender supporting the $300 public defender fee and cost
award. See §§ 27.52(1)(b), 938.29(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2015); Alexis, 211 So. 3d at 83.
AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED with instructions.
SAWAYA, BERGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 So. 3d 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryan-t-robinson-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.