Bryan Solis v. State
Opinion
NUMBER 13-14-00008-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
BRYAN SOLIS, APPELLANT, v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.
On appeal from the 36th District Court of Aransas County, Texas.
ORDER ABATING APPEAL
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria Order Per Curiam
This cause is before the Court on appellant's unopposed explanation for failure to file a brief and motion to abate appeal. Counsel’s motion states that prior counsel filed no designation of record and an incomplete record exists. Without a complete record, counsel cannot file a brief.
When a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk’s record or reporter’s record, the trial court, appellate court, or any party may by letter direct the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a supplemental clerk’s record containing the omitted item or items. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1), 34.6(d). Counsel has filed a supplemental request for the record from the clerk and court reporter. Accordingly, appellant’s motion to abate is GRANTED and this appeal is ABATED.
This appeal will be reinstated within thirty days or further order of this court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 15th day of August , 2014.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bryan Solis v. State (Bryan Solis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.