Bryan Newland v. Attorney Grievance Commission
This text of Bryan Newland v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Bryan Newland v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
September 15, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack 156301(4) David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen BRYAN NEWLAND, Kurtis T. Wilder, Plaintiff, Justices SC: 156301 v AGC: 0346-15 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant. _________________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant to extend the time for filing its response to the complaint for superintending control is GRANTED. The response will be accepted for filing if submitted on or before September 22, 2017.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 15, 2017 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bryan Newland v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryan-newland-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2017.