Bryan Keith Gutierrez v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-26-00160-CR
Bryan Keith GUTIERREZ, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas Trial Court No. 25-09-00102-CRK Honorable Jennifer Dillingham, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 8, 2026
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
The clerk’s record reflects that on March 2, 2026, appellant filed a “Motion for Bond
Relief” in this court, appearing to challenge the amount set as bail and requesting that several
indictments against him be quashed. The record does not reflect a judgment of conviction. We
liberally construe appellant’s motion as a notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2.
“Jurisdiction must be expressly given to the courts of appeals in a statute.” Ragston v. State,
424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). “There is no constitutional or statutory authority 04-26-00160-CR
granting the courts of appeals jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals regarding excessive bail or
the denial of bail.” Id. And we have no jurisdiction to review an interlocutory order denying a
motion to quash an indictment. Ex parte Alvear, 524 S.W.3d 261, 263 (Tex. App.—Waco 2016,
no pet.).
We accordingly ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed
for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bryan Keith Gutierrez v. the State of Texas (Bryan Keith Gutierrez v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.