Bryan Imari Dias v. Hannah Grizzle
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-24-00743-CV
Bryan Imari DIAS,
Appellant
v.
Hannah GRIZZLE,
Appellee
From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2024-CI-21504 Honorable Benjamin Robertson, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice Todd McCray, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 8, 2025 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Appellant seeks to appeal from temporary orders in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. In family law cases, temporary orders are not appealable. See TEX. FAM. CODE § 105.001(e); In re K.K.M., No. 04-12-00677-CV, 2013 WL 820585, at * 1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 6, 2013, no pet.) (dismissing appeal from temporary orders in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship because the challenged orders were not appealable); see also Dancy v. Daggett, 815 S.W.2d 548, 549 (Tex. 1991) (recognizing mandamus as the appropriate vehicle to challenge temporary orders in family law cases because temporary orders are not subject to
04-24-00743-CV
interlocutory appeal under the family code). Accordingly, we ordered appellant to show cause why we have jurisdiction over this appeal. Appellant filed a response to our order, but it fails to demonstrate our jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. FAM. CODE § 105.001(e); In re K.K.M., 2013 WL 820585, at * 1.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bryan Imari Dias v. Hannah Grizzle (Bryan Imari Dias v. Hannah Grizzle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.