Bryan Imari Dias v. Hannah Grizzle

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 8, 2025·No. 04-24-00743-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-24-00743-CV

Bryan Imari DIAS,

Appellant

v.

Hannah GRIZZLE,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2024-CI-21504 Honorable Benjamin Robertson, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice Todd McCray, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 8, 2025 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Appellant seeks to appeal from temporary orders in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. In family law cases, temporary orders are not appealable. See TEX. FAM. CODE § 105.001(e); In re K.K.M., No. 04-12-00677-CV, 2013 WL 820585, at * 1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 6, 2013, no pet.) (dismissing appeal from temporary orders in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship because the challenged orders were not appealable); see also Dancy v. Daggett, 815 S.W.2d 548, 549 (Tex. 1991) (recognizing mandamus as the appropriate vehicle to challenge temporary orders in family law cases because temporary orders are not subject to

04-24-00743-CV

interlocutory appeal under the family code). Accordingly, we ordered appellant to show cause why we have jurisdiction over this appeal. Appellant filed a response to our order, but it fails to demonstrate our jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. FAM. CODE § 105.001(e); In re K.K.M., 2013 WL 820585, at * 1.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryan Imari Dias v. Hannah Grizzle, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Bryan Imari Dias v. Hannah Grizzle (Bryan Imari Dias v. Hannah Grizzle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dancy v. Daggett
815 S.W.2d 548 (Texas Supreme Court, 1991)