Bryan Deion Williams v. State
This text of Bryan Deion Williams v. State (Bryan Deion Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-12-00083-CR
BRYAN DEION WILLIAMS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 124th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 40789-B
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. ORDER Bryan Deion Williams, appellant, was convicted of possession of a controlled substance
and sentenced to seventy-five years’ in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional
Institutions Division. His notice of appeal was timely filed May 15, 2012. The clerk’s record
was filed June 19, 2012, and the reporter’s record was filed September 14, 2012, making the
appellant’s brief due October 15, 2012. Counsel is appointed.
On appellant’s motion, we extended the deadline for filing the brief to November 14,
2012. Since that time, we have received neither the appellant’s brief nor a request for a further
extension of the filing deadline. Inquiries from our clerk’s office to appellant’s counsel
regarding the overdue brief have gone unanswered. On December 17, 2012, the clerk’s office
received a letter from Williams stating, in pertinent part, “I am the appellant in this cause. I have
an appeal attorney but haven’t heard anything from him. Would you please tell me if a brief has
been filed in this cause, and the due date for the appellants [sic] brief.”
Because the brief has not been filed and because we have heard nothing further from
appellant’s counsel, we abate this case to the trial court pursuant to Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedure for a hearing to determine why counsel has not filed the brief,
whether the brief can be promptly filed with this Court, whether Williams desires to prosecute
his appeal, and whether he is indigent. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). The hearing is to be
conducted within fifteen days of the date of this order. The trial court may also address other
matters as it deems appropriate, including appointing different counsel for appellant if necessary.
2 The trial court’s findings and recommendations on the issues set forth above shall be
entered into the record of the case and presented to this Court in the form of a supplemental
clerk’s record within fifteen days of the date of the hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(3). The
reporter’s record of the hearing shall also be filed with this Court in the form of a supplemental
reporter’s record within fifteen days of the date of the hearing. See id.
All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on our receipt of (1) the appellant’s
brief or (2) the supplemental appellate record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: January 31, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bryan Deion Williams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryan-deion-williams-v-state-texapp-2013.