Bryan Alsworth, A/K/A W. M. White v. Mary Sue Terry David Williams Edward W. Murray

966 F.2d 1441, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 21236, 1992 WL 138377
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 22, 1992
Docket92-6457
StatusUnpublished

This text of 966 F.2d 1441 (Bryan Alsworth, A/K/A W. M. White v. Mary Sue Terry David Williams Edward W. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bryan Alsworth, A/K/A W. M. White v. Mary Sue Terry David Williams Edward W. Murray, 966 F.2d 1441, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 21236, 1992 WL 138377 (4th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

966 F.2d 1441

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Bryan ALSWORTH, a/k/a W. M. White, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Mary Sue TERRY; David Williams; Edward W. Murray,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 92-6457.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 8, 1992
Decided: June 22, 1992

Bryan Alsworth, Appellant Pro Se.

John H. McLees, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Bryan Alsworth seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge.* Alsworth v. Terry, No. CA-91-424 (E.D. Va. Apr. 15, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

We note that Alsworth may not have raised his present claim D in state courts. However, that claim is clearly precluded under Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
966 F.2d 1441, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 21236, 1992 WL 138377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryan-alsworth-aka-w-m-white-v-mary-sue-terry-davi-ca4-1992.