Bryan A. Spellers v. State
This text of Bryan A. Spellers v. State (Bryan A. Spellers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
BRYAN A. SPELLERS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-1231
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed July 28, 2017
3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Dan Traver, Judge.
Bryan A. Spellers, Bristol, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Bryan Spellers appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal
Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. He argues that the jury’s special
finding that he discharged a firearm was insufficient under Apprendi1 because the jury
was not instructed that that they had to make the special finding beyond a reasonable
doubt. Although the trial court is correct that "Florida law does not require an express
1 Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). indication that special findings are made beyond a reasonable doubt when such indication
may be inferred from the record," see State v. Woodall, 216 So. 3d 30, 33 (Fla. 5th DCA
2017), here, nothing may be inferred from the record because no record was attached to
the order. Accordingly, we reverse the order summarily denying Spellers' claim and
remand for attachment of the records conclusively refuting his claim.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
TORPY, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bryan A. Spellers v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryan-a-spellers-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.