Brutsch v. Brutsch
This text of Brutsch v. Brutsch (Brutsch v. Brutsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000703 23-OCT-2015 11:00 AM SCWC-12-0000703
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
KARL ROBERT BRUTSCH, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
vs.
CELIA KAY BRUTSCH, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. _________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000703; FC-D NO. 09-1-2906)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.
The application for writ of certiorari filed on September 11, 2015 by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee Celia Kay Brutsch is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 23, 2015. Peter Van Name Esser & /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald P. Gregory Frey for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
Samuel P. King, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for respondent /s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brutsch v. Brutsch, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brutsch-v-brutsch-haw-2015.