Brutsch v. Brutsch

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brutsch v. Brutsch. Read the opinion of the Court — 139 Haw. 373
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 23, 2015·No. SCWC-12-0000703·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000703 23-OCT-2015 11:00 AM

SCWC-12-0000703

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

KARL ROBERT BRUTSCH,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

vs.

CELIA KAY BRUTSCH,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000703; FC-D NO. 09-1-2906)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.

The application for writ of certiorari filed on September 11, 2015 by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee Celia Kay Brutsch is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 23, 2015.

Peter Van Name Esser & /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald P. Gregory Frey for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Samuel P. King, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for respondent /s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brutsch v. Brutsch, (haw 2015).

Brutsch v. Brutsch (Brutsch v. Brutsch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.