Bruton v. Harrell

107 S.E. 586, 151 Ga. 494, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 309
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 11, 1921·No. No. 2249·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

George, J.

1. An assignment of error complaining that the court erred in admitting in evidence the report of proeessioners, accompanied by the surveyor’s plat, is incomplete and will not be considered by this court, where the report of the proeessioners is not set forth either literally or in substance in the bill of exceptions or attached as an exhibit, though the evidence to which the plaintiff in error objected is set out in the brief of evidence.

2. Under the pleadings and the evidence the court did not abuse his discretion in refusing an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruton v. Harrell, 107 S.E. 586, 151 Ga. 494, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 309 (Ga. 1921).

107 S.E. 586 (Bruton v. Harrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maxwell v. Hollis
104 S.E.2d 893 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)