Bruton v. Harrell
This text of 107 S.E. 586 (Bruton v. Harrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. An assignment of error complaining that the court erred in admitting in evidence the report of proeessioners, accompanied by the surveyor’s plat, is incomplete and will not be considered by this court, where the report of the proeessioners is not set forth either literally or in substance in the bill of exceptions or attached as an exhibit, though the evidence to which the plaintiff in error objected is set out in the brief of evidence.
2. Under the pleadings and the evidence the court did not abuse his discretion in refusing an interlocutory injunction.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 S.E. 586, 151 Ga. 494, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruton-v-harrell-ga-1921.