Bruto v. George Herman & Associates, Inc.
393 N.E.2d 1042, 47 N.Y.2d 941, 419 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2195
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (64 AD2d 844).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Fuchs-berg.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bruto v. George Herman & Associates, Inc., 393 N.E.2d 1042, 47 N.Y.2d 941, 419 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2195 (N.Y. 1979).
393 N.E.2d 1042 (Bruto v. George Herman & Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schwartz v. Foley
142 A.D.2d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)