Bruto v. George Herman & Associates, Inc.
393 N.E.2d 1042, 47 N.Y.2d 941, 419 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2195
This text of 393 N.E.2d 1042 (Bruto v. George Herman & Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bruto v. George Herman & Associates, Inc., 393 N.E.2d 1042, 47 N.Y.2d 941, 419 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2195 (N.Y. 1979).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (64 AD2d 844).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Fuchs-berg.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Schwartz v. Foley
142 A.D.2d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
393 N.E.2d 1042, 47 N.Y.2d 941, 419 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruto-v-george-herman-associates-inc-ny-1979.