Brush v. State
This text of 148 So. 3d 150 (Brush v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s January 16, 2014, motion for post-conviction relief. We also affirm the trial court’s March 13, 2014, order denying appointment of counsel. However, we reverse that portion of the March 13, 2014, order that considered, on the merits, Appellant’s request to file a successive motion for postconviction relief to raise additional claims. The trial court was without jurisdiction to consider the additional claims as this appeal was still pending.1
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 So. 3d 150, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15376, 2014 WL 4929064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brush-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.