Brush v. Robinson

2 Tyl. 358
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedJanuary 15, 1803
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Tyl. 358 (Brush v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brush v. Robinson, 2 Tyl. 358 (Vt. 1803).

Opinion

That the certificate of a Judge of the County Court and Justice of the Peace, prescribed in the act entitled, an act relating to gaols and gaolers, and for the relief of persons imprisoned therein, passed March the 9th, A. D. 1797, delivered to a prisoner admitted to the liberties of the prison, is a sufficient bar to an action brought by the sheriff or his assignee upon the bail-bond, and escape assigned as a breach, without setting forth other than substantially and as inducement, the mesne process. That all exceptions to such process must be taken before the Court holden by the Judge and Justice. That the Supreme and County Courts cannot judge over the Court of Gaol Delivery, as it is vulgarly called, where the [360]*360process is merely voidable, but only where it is void ab initio.

Daniel Chipman and Arrias Marsh, for plaintiff. Lott Hall, for defendant.

Judgment, that plea in bar is sufficient.

This decision has not been since shaken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hubbell v. Dimick
1 Vt. 253 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1828)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Tyl. 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brush-v-robinson-vt-1803.