Brush Electric Light & Power Co. v. Wells

39 S.E. 478, 113 Ga. 1010, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 454
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 20, 1901·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Where the losing party in the trial of an action in the court below moves for a new trial upon many grounds, and the trial judge, by written order, grants the motion generally, the movant can not except to the grant of his motion, although in a colloquy between his counsel and the judge the latter may have stated that the new trial was granted for reasons other than those given in the motion.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brush Electric Light & Power Co. v. Wells, 39 S.E. 478, 113 Ga. 1010, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 454 (Ga. 1901).

39 S.E. 478 (Brush Electric Light & Power Co. v. Wells) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Klaer v. Welborn
78 S.E.2d 444 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)