Brush Electric Light & Power Co. v. Wells

Supreme Court of Georgia

Brush Electric Light & Power Co. v. Wells

39 S.E. 478, 113 Ga. 1010, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 454

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 20, 1901

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 S.E. 478 (Brush Electric Light & Power Co. v. Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brush Electric Light & Power Co. v. Wells, 39 S.E. 478, 113 Ga. 1010, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 454 (Ga. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Where the losing party in the trial of an action in the court below moves for a new trial upon many grounds, and the trial judge, by written order, grants the motion generally, the movant can not except to the grant of his motion, although in a colloquy between his counsel and the judge the latter may have stated that the new trial was granted for reasons other than those given in the motion.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons, C. J.

Where the losing party in the trial of an action in the court below moves for a new trial upon many grounds, and the trial judge, by written order, grants the motion generally, the movant can not except to the grant of his motion, although in a colloquy between his counsel and the judge the latter may have stated that the new trial was granted for reasons other than those given in the motion.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 S.E. 478, 113 Ga. 1010, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brush-electric-light-power-co-v-wells-ga-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack