Brusca v. Maschino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brusca v. Maschino

61 A.D.2d 973, 402 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10583

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 6, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 61 A.D.2d 973 (Brusca v. Maschino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brusca v. Maschino, 61 A.D.2d 973, 402 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10583 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to vacate a mechanic’s lien, defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered June 2, 1977, which, upon his default, denied his motion (a) to be relieved of a prior default and (b) for leave to interpose an answer and (2) a further order of the same court, dated July 5, 1977, which, inter alia, denied his renewal motion for the same relief. Appeal from the order entered June 2, 1977 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an order made on default. Order dated July 5, 1977 reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. There is no inherent power in a court to discharge a mechanic’s lien independent of statutory authority (Benton v Wickwire, 54 NY 226; Madden v Lennon, 23 Misc 79). On the record before it, Special Term had no statutory basis upon which to vacate the lien; strict compliance with the Lien Law is necessary for a vacatur. Moreover, it was an abuse of discretion for Special Term not to open the default since defendant presented a viable excuse. Martuscello, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to vacate a mechanic’s lien, defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered June 2, 1977, which, upon his default, denied his motion (a) to be relieved of a prior default and (b) for leave to interpose an answer and (2) a further order of the same court, dated July 5, 1977, which, inter alia, denied his renewal motion for the same relief. Appeal from the order entered June 2, 1977 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an order made on default. Order dated July 5, 1977 reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. There is no inherent power in a court to discharge a mechanic’s lien independent of statutory authority (Benton v Wickwire, 54 NY 226; Madden v Lennon, 23 Misc 79). On the record before it, Special Term had no statutory basis upon which to vacate the lien; strict compliance with the Lien Law is necessary for a vacatur. Moreover, it was an abuse of discretion for Special Term not to open the default since defendant presented a viable excuse. Martuscello, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 973, 402 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brusca-v-maschino-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack