Brunt v. Brunt

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Brunt v. Brunt

272 So. 3d 829

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 17, 2019

DocketCase No. 2D18-3832

StatusPublished

This text of 272 So. 3d 829 (Brunt v. Brunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brunt v. Brunt, 272 So. 3d 829 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

ATKINSON, Judge.

We affirm the single order entered by the trial court titled "final judgment denying former husband's supplemental petition for modification of final judgment of dissolution of marriage; final judgment on former husband's supplemental petition as to modification of child support only; and final orders on former wife's multiple motions for contempt/enforcement." See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). However, we grant the appellee's motion to dismiss and dismiss for lack of jurisdiction the portion of the *830appeal challenging the trial court's finding as to the wife's entitlement to attorney's fees. See McIlveen v. McIlveen, 644 So.2d 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

SILBERMAN and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATKINSON, Judge.

We affirm the single order entered by the trial court titled "final judgment denying former husband's supplemental petition for modification of final judgment of dissolution of marriage; final judgment on former husband's supplemental petition as to modification of child support only; and final orders on former wife's multiple motions for contempt/enforcement." See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). However, we grant the appellee's motion to dismiss and dismiss for lack of jurisdiction the portion of the *830appeal challenging the trial court's finding as to the wife's entitlement to attorney's fees. See McIlveen v. McIlveen, 644 So.2d 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

SILBERMAN and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 So. 3d 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brunt-v-brunt-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack