Brunswick & Western Railroad v. Mayor of Waycross

94 Ga. 102
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 11, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 94 Ga. 102 (Brunswick & Western Railroad v. Mayor of Waycross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brunswick & Western Railroad v. Mayor of Waycross, 94 Ga. 102 (Ga. 1894).

Opinion

Simmons, Justice.

Under the facts of this case we think the judge erred in not granting the injunction prayed for. While it is true the legislature, in the charter of the city of Way-[104]*104cross, granted power to the municipality to lay out and open streets (Acts 1889, p. 897), it did not grant power to take or damage private property for the purpose, or to provide by ordinance for assessing or otherwise ascertaining the amount of compensation. Our constitution declares that “'private property shall not be taken or damaged for public purposes without just and adequate compensation being first paid” (Code, §5024); and the facts disclosed by the record show that to open a street across the right of way of the railroad company, as contemplated by the municipal authorities, would result in great damage to the company. A municipal corporation has no more right than any other corporation to condemn property and provide the mode of assessing compensation therefor, unless authority to do so is granted by the legislature in express terms or by necessary implication. Such authority cannot be implied from the grant of power to lay but and open streets. In the absence of any further provision authorizing the municipal authorities to condemn property for that purpose, the presumption is that the legislature intended that the necessai'y property should be acquired by contract. The fact that the city has passed an ordinance providing method and machinery for assessing compensation, is no substitute for the necessary statutory authority on the subject. See Lewis, Eminent Domain, §240 ; 6 Am. & Eng. Enc. of Law, 517. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Poole v. Southern Railway Co.
129 S.E. 297 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Zachry v. Mayor of Harlem
75 S.E. 4 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Town of Decatur
59 S.E. 217 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Stowe v. Town of Newborn
56 S.E. 516 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Mayor of Union Point
47 S.E. 183 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 Ga. 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brunswick-western-railroad-v-mayor-of-waycross-ga-1894.