Brunswick Timber Co. v. Bryan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Brunswick Timber Co. v. Bryan

186 S.E. 199, 53 Ga. App. 410, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 137

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 8, 1936

Docket25153

StatusPublished

This text of 186 S.E. 199 (Brunswick Timber Co. v. Bryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brunswick Timber Co. v. Bryan, 186 S.E. 199, 53 Ga. App. 410, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 137 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Sutton, J.

1. The parties and the facts in the present case are identical with the parties and the facts in the case of Brunswick Timber Co. v. Guy, 52 Ga. App. 617 (184 S. E. 426), with the exception of the claim[411]*411ant for compensation, and this case is controlled by the decision of this court in the above case.

Decided June 8, 1936. Walter Thomas, II. F. Rawls, for plaintiff in error. Charles F. Harper, Harry M. Wilson, contra.

2. “It follows that so much of the award as found in favor of the claimant against the Brunswick Lumber Company, a corporation, on the theory that it was liable as a copartner with Busbee, by virtue of the terms of the contract between them, in the enterprise in which they were engaged when the claimant was injured, was erroneous, and the superior court erred in affirming' the award. Busbee did not appeal from the finding against him.” Brunswick Timber Co. v. Guy, supra.

Jtidgmenb reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI