Brunswick Site Co. v. Berlin Neuroder Art Printing Co.

154 N.Y.S. 1069
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJuly 8, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 154 N.Y.S. 1069 (Brunswick Site Co. v. Berlin Neuroder Art Printing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brunswick Site Co. v. Berlin Neuroder Art Printing Co., 154 N.Y.S. 1069 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinions

GUY, J.

The written notice delivered in March, 1914, as provided by the then existing lease, operated automatically as making a new written lease for two years to begin July 31, 1914. All subsequent negotiations were merely an attempt to agree upon a modification of said lease.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

WHITAKER, J-, concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thurston v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
117 N.E. 686 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 N.Y.S. 1069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brunswick-site-co-v-berlin-neuroder-art-printing-co-nyappterm-1915.