Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.
424 U.S. 908, 96 S. Ct. 1101
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 23, 1976
DocketNo. 75-904
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases
This text of 424 U.S. 908 (Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 424 U.S. 908, 96 S. Ct. 1101 (1976).
Opinion
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows:
“1. Does the mere continued presence in certain local markets of retail establishments allegedly ‘acquired' by a ‘deep pocket’ manufacturer in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act afford a basis for competing retailers to recover damages under Section 4 of the Clayton Act when there is no proof that the ‘acquisitions’ resulted in any lessening of competition or monopoly in those markets?
“2. Does not the ‘failing company’ principle require dismissal of a treble-damage action based on alleged violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act where the plaintiffs’ entire damage theory is based on the premise that the ‘acquired’ businesses would have failed and disappeared from the market had the defendant not kept them alive by making the challenged ‘acquisitions’?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Steven M. Asherman v. Larry Meachum, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction
957 F.2d 978 (Second Circuit, 1992)
Homefinders of America, Inc. v. Providence Journal Company
621 F.2d 441 (First Circuit, 1980)
Purex Corp., Ltd. v. Procter & Gamble Co.
419 F. Supp. 931 (C.D. California, 1976)
David Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc. And Quincy Adams Donuts, Inc. C/o C.T. Corporation, in No. 75--1625. John Rader, an Individual v. Dunkin' Donuts, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc., a Massachusetts Corporation, in No. 75--1626
531 F.2d 1211 (Third Circuit, 1976)
Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc.
531 F.2d 1211 (Third Circuit, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
424 U.S. 908, 96 S. Ct. 1101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brunswick-corp-v-pueblo-bowl-o-mat-inc-scotus-1976.