Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Klumpp

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Klumpp

128 F. 1023, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4733

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJanuary 11, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 128 F. 1023 (Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Klumpp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Klumpp, 128 F. 1023, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4733 (circtsdny 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

LACO.MBE. Circuit Judge.

No good reason for withdrawing the answer is shown. If defendants decide that further prosecution of the defense is not worth its cost to them, they may offer to submit to a decree in the usual form, sustaining title and validity of patent, finding infringement, and for injunction and accounting. This will relievo them from liability for any subsequent costs for taking testimony and printing record. They cannot escape accounting by no longer litigating the main issues; but there seems no doubt, in view of what was said on the argument, that a fixed sum for each alley may be agreed upon, and possibly also the number of alleys made or sold which embody the device of the patent as found by the decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACO.MBE. Circuit Judge.

No good reason for withdrawing the answer is shown. If defendants decide that further prosecution of the defense is not worth its cost to them, they may offer to submit to a decree in the usual form, sustaining title and validity of patent, finding infringement, and for injunction and accounting. This will relievo them from liability for any subsequent costs for taking testimony and printing record. They cannot escape accounting by no longer litigating the main issues; but there seems no doubt, in view of what was said on the argument, that a fixed sum for each alley may be agreed upon, and possibly also the number of alleys made or sold which embody the device of the patent as found by the decree.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 F. 1023, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brunswick-balke-collender-co-v-klumpp-circtsdny-1904.