Brunstein v. Brunstein

273 A.D. 847, 76 N.Y.S.2d 599
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 16, 1948·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Great weight should be given to the decision of the trial court who saw and heard the witnesses and allowed a wide scope to the introduction of evidence during the five days’ trial. The record supports the judgment in plaintiff’s favor.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Peck, P. J., Dore and Shientag, JJ., concur; Glennon and Van Voorhis, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and dismiss the plaintiff’s cause of action for separation alleged in the complaint and to grant the husband a separation on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment as alleged in his counterclaim and to provide for the custody of the child in accordance with the judgment of the court [848] below and to require the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $50 a week for the support and maintenance of the child.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brunstein v. Brunstein, 273 A.D. 847, 76 N.Y.S.2d 599 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

273 A.D. 847 (Brunstein v. Brunstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCall v. Town of Middlebury
52 A.D.2d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)