Brunson v. State
977 So. 2d 748, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4358, 2008 WL 783282
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 26, 2008·No. No. 2D06-5446·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm Vincent Brunson’s withheld adjudication entered after he was found guilty of possession of cocaine and the probationary sentence imposed thereon. [749] In order to prevent confusion in any future proceedings, however, we note that-the probation order contains a scrivener’s error. The probation order incorrectly reflects that Brunson entered a plea. Brun-son was found guilty by a jury.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brunson v. State, 977 So. 2d 748, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4358, 2008 WL 783282 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).
977 So. 2d 748 (Brunson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Folsom v. State
181 So. 3d 1255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Murphy v. State
977 So. 2d 748 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)