Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Brunson v. State

Brunson v. State

977 So. 2d 748, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4358, 2008 WL 783282
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 26, 2008
DocketNo. 2D06-5446
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 977 So. 2d 748 (Brunson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brunson v. State, 977 So. 2d 748, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4358, 2008 WL 783282 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

SALCINES, Judge.

We affirm Vincent Brunson’s withheld adjudication entered after he was found guilty of possession of cocaine and the probationary sentence imposed thereon. [749]*749In order to prevent confusion in any future proceedings, however, we note that-the probation order contains a scrivener’s error. The probation order incorrectly reflects that Brunson entered a plea. Brun-son was found guilty by a jury.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Folsom v. State
181 So. 3d 1255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Murphy v. State
977 So. 2d 748 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
977 So. 2d 748, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4358, 2008 WL 783282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brunson-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.