Brunson v. State

595 So. 2d 1113, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4078, 1992 WL 67926
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 6, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1347
StatusPublished

This text of 595 So. 2d 1113 (Brunson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brunson v. State, 595 So. 2d 1113, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4078, 1992 WL 67926 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We strike that portion of the sentencing order which authorizes “Probation and Parole” to set the amount of restitution, and we remand for the trial court to set the amount of restitution. See McCaskill v. State, 520 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). In all other respects, the judgment and sentence are affirmed. See Jefferson v. State, 595 So.2d 38 (Fla.1992).

BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jefferson v. State
595 So. 2d 38 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
McCaskill v. State
520 So. 2d 664 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
595 So. 2d 1113, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4078, 1992 WL 67926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brunson-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.