Brunson v. State
This text of 537 So. 2d 692 (Brunson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Willie BRUNSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, Phil Patterson, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert L. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Carolyn J. Mosley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
SMITH, Chief Judge.
The appellant appeals several of the conditions of his probation. The record reflects that the appellant neither objected to the conditions when they were imposed nor filed a motion to strike or correct the challenged conditions. These allegedly improper conditions should have been brought to the trial court's attention before appeal was taken. Walker v. State, 461 So.2d 229 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Myers v. State, 426 So.2d 986 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Accordingly, we affirm the order of probation without prejudice to the appellant to file a motion pursuant to Rule 3.800, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
AFFIRMED.
ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
537 So. 2d 692, 1989 WL 5678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brunson-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.