Brunson v. Sparks
42 Ga. 35
Opinion
The question in this case comes before the Court from the refusal of the Court below to grant a new trial. Under the facts in this case the whole question for adjudication was fairly submitted to the jury, and there is sufficient evidence to sustain their verdict. And under the well established rules of this Court we will not disturb the judgment of the Court below in refusing a new trial, inasmuch as we are satisfied with the verdict of the jury.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brunson v. Sparks, 42 Ga. 35 (Ga. 1871).
42 Ga. 35 (Brunson v. Sparks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hynko v. Hilton
401 S.E.2d 324 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Cabral v. White
354 S.E.2d 162 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)