Brunson v. PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (PCRA) CRIMINAL TRIAL DIVISION/POSTTRIAL UNIT

38 A.3d 765, 614 Pa. 453, 2012 WL 432095, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 281
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 13, 2012·No. 95 EM 2011·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2012, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filing to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brunson v. PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (PCRA) CRIMINAL TRIAL DIVISION/POSTTRIAL UNIT, 38 A.3d 765, 614 Pa. 453, 2012 WL 432095, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 281 (Pa. 2012).

38 A.3d 765 (Brunson v. PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (PCRA) CRIMINAL TRIAL DIVISION/POSTTRIAL UNIT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)