Brunson v. McCoy

Supreme Court of Florida

Brunson v. McCoy

319 So. 2d 12, 1975 Fla. LEXIS 3960

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 25, 1975

DocketNo. 45694

StatusPublished

This text of 319 So. 2d 12 (Brunson v. McCoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brunson v. McCoy, 319 So. 2d 12, 1975 Fla. LEXIS 3960 (Fla. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

TENCH, Circuit Judge.

We have for consideration a petition for writ of certiorari directed to the Industrial Relations Commission, our jurisdiction arising under Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla.Const., which provides that this Court “may issue writs of certiorari to commissions established by general law having statewide jurisdiction.”

The issue presented is whether the Industrial Relations Commission may review and reverse the Judge of Industrial Claims where the only evidence presented to the Judge of Industrial Claims is depositions of witnesses. We hold it may.

This issue was resolved in Mendivil v. Tampa Envelope Manufacturing Co., 233 So.2d 5 (Fla.1970), in which the Supreme Court stated:

“. . . all evidence was submitted by deposition. The industrial judge did not personally see any of the witnesses. The [13]*13Full Commission was, therefore, in as good a position to evaluate the credibility of witnesses and weigh the evidence as was the industrial judge.” [Emphasis not supplied]

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

ADKINS, C. J., ROBERTS, OVER-TON and ENGLAND, JJ., and ALDERMAN and MORPHONIOS, Circuit Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI