Brunson v. Bacon
1 Root 210
This text of 1 Root 210 (Brunson v. Bacon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brunson v. Bacon, 1 Root 210 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).
Opinion
Indebitatus Assumpsit will not lie to recover back money, wbicb has been recovered in an action at law, upon tbe ground of an agreement or accord, wbicb if it bad been executed, might have been plead in bar of the action.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Risman, Partners v. Krupar
186 N.E. 830 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1933)
Beard v. Beard
25 W. Va. 486 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1885)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brunson-v-bacon-connsuperct-1790.