Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bruno's, Inc./Food World v. Bruner

Bruno's, Inc./Food World v. Bruner

805 So. 2d 1090, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 973, 2002 WL 126365
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 1, 2002
DocketNo. 1D00-3181
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 805 So. 2d 1090 (Bruno's, Inc./Food World v. Bruner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bruno's, Inc./Food World v. Bruner, 805 So. 2d 1090, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 973, 2002 WL 126365 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the award of temporary partial disability benefits and therefore reject the argument made in the main appeal. However, we conclude that the claimant has shown reversible error as to the issue presented in the cross appeal. The claimant is entitled to an award of penalties, because the evidence supporting the claim of temporary partial disability benefits was available to the employer and carrier at the time they declined payment. See Eastern Indus., Inc. v. Burnham, 750 So.2d 748 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

PADOVANO, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DOLLAR GENERAL v. McCoy
927 So. 2d 169 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Shaw v. Florida Steel Corp.
846 So. 2d 1254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
805 So. 2d 1090, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 973, 2002 WL 126365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brunos-incfood-world-v-bruner-fladistctapp-2002.