Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bruno v. State

Bruno v. State

395 So. 2d 631, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19838
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 25, 1981
DocketNo. ZZ-209
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 395 So. 2d 631 (Bruno v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bruno v. State, 395 So. 2d 631, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19838 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Judge.

Bruno’s appeal from an order denying his Rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief urges that a split sentence committing him to the Department of Corrections for five years, three to be served by imprisonment, followed by two on probation, is unlawfully equivalent to a sentence of probation for five years on condition that the subject serve three years in prison. Villery v. Parole and Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1980). We disagree. See Hollingsworth v. State, 394 So.2d 580 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

AFFIRMED.

McCORD and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rita v. State
470 So. 2d 80 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
395 So. 2d 631, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruno-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.