Bruno v. State
395 So. 2d 631, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19838
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 25, 1981·No. No. ZZ-209·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Bruno’s appeal from an order denying his Rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief urges that a split sentence committing him to the Department of Corrections for five years, three to be served by imprisonment, followed by two on probation, is unlawfully equivalent to a sentence of probation for five years on condition that the subject serve three years in prison. Villery v. Parole and Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1980). We disagree. See Hollingsworth v. State, 394 So.2d 580 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bruno v. State, 395 So. 2d 631, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19838 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
395 So. 2d 631 (Bruno v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rita v. State
470 So. 2d 80 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)