Bruno v. Mundy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Bruno v. Mundy

316 A.2d 425, 64 N.J. 337, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 221, 86 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3120

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 20, 1974·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is modified so as to vacate and set aside that part thereof which directs counsel for the defendants to restore to the Receiver the $1,000 paid and advanced to them out of the funds and assets of Local 853 under Paragraph 2 of the November 9, 1971 order of the trial court.

As so modified the judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division reported at 127 N. J. Super. 84 (1974).

For affirmance and modification ■—• Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Jacobs, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman and Clifford—6.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is modified so as to vacate and set aside that part thereof which directs counsel for the defendants to restore to the Receiver the $1,000 paid and advanced to them out of the funds and assets of Local 853 under Paragraph 2 of the November 9, 1971 order of the trial court.

As so modified the judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division reported at 127 N. J. Super. 84 (1974).

For affirmance and modification ■—• Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Jacobs, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman and Clifford—6.

For reversal — None.

Bruno v. Mundy, 316 A.2d 425, 64 N.J. 337, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 221, 86 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3120 (N.J. 1974).

Pincite

316 A.2d 425 (Bruno v. Mundy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related