Bruno v. Miller
This text of 549 So. 2d 234 (Bruno v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was respondent in a dissolution of marriage proceeding. She appeals the final judgment, challenging the trial court’s factual findings and claiming error with respect to the amounts awarded. Our review is confined to the record made before the trial court, Tyson v. Aikman, 159 Fla. 273, 31 So.2d 272, 273 (1947), and there is substantial competent evidence which supports the trial court’s findings. Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13, 16 (Fla.1976). The trial court has great discretion in the fashioning of an equitable decree in matrimonial matters, Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980), and no abuse of that discretion has been shown.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
549 So. 2d 234, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2257, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5196, 1989 WL 110945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruno-v-miller-fladistctapp-1989.