Bruno v. Miller

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bruno v. Miller

549 So. 2d 234, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2257, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5196, 1989 WL 110945

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 26, 1989·No. No. 89-549·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was respondent in a dissolution of marriage proceeding. She appeals the final judgment, challenging the trial court’s factual findings and claiming error with respect to the amounts awarded. Our review is confined to the record made before the trial court, Tyson v. Aikman, 159 Fla. 273, 31 So.2d 272, 273 (1947), and there is substantial competent evidence which supports the trial court’s findings. Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13, 16 (Fla.1976). The trial court has great discretion in the fashioning of an equitable decree in matrimonial matters, Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980), and no abuse of that discretion has been shown.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was respondent in a dissolution of marriage proceeding. She appeals the final judgment, challenging the trial court’s factual findings and claiming error with respect to the amounts awarded. Our review is confined to the record made before the trial court, Tyson v. Aikman, 159 Fla. 273, 31 So.2d 272, 273 (1947), and there is substantial competent evidence which supports the trial court’s findings. Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13, 16 (Fla.1976). The trial court has great discretion in the fashioning of an equitable decree in matrimonial matters, Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980), and no abuse of that discretion has been shown.

Affirmed.

Bruno v. Miller, 549 So. 2d 234, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2257, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5196, 1989 WL 110945 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

549 So. 2d 234 (Bruno v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related