Bruno v. Heinrich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bruno v. Heinrich

202 A.D.2d 256, 609 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2278

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 A.D.2d 256 (Bruno v. Heinrich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bruno v. Heinrich, 202 A.D.2d 256, 609 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2278 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Nassau County (John S. Lockman, J.), entered December 12, 1991, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant-appellant has failed to establish as a matter of law that decedent’s conduct was an unforeseeable intervening act that constituted a superceding cause relieving him from any potential liability for allowing her to exit his car on a six-lane highway with no provision for pedestrian traffic (see, Rivera v New York City Tr. Auth., 77 NY2d 322; Kriz v Schum, 75 NY2d 25; Kush v City of Buffalo, 59 NY2d 26). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ross, Asch, Rubin and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Nassau County (John S. Lockman, J.), entered December 12, 1991, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant-appellant has failed to establish as a matter of law that decedent’s conduct was an unforeseeable intervening act that constituted a superceding cause relieving him from any potential liability for allowing her to exit his car on a six-lane highway with no provision for pedestrian traffic (see, Rivera v New York City Tr. Auth., 77 NY2d 322; Kriz v Schum, 75 NY2d 25; Kush v City of Buffalo, 59 NY2d 26). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ross, Asch, Rubin and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D.2d 256, 609 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruno-v-heinrich-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack