Bruno v. Albert Einstein College of Medicine

191 A.D.2d 352, 595 N.Y.S.2d 405

This text of 191 A.D.2d 352 (Bruno v. Albert Einstein College of Medicine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bruno v. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 191 A.D.2d 352, 595 N.Y.S.2d 405 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Hansel McGee, J.), entered June 25, 1991, which denied defendant-appellant Finkel’s motion to renew and reargue, unanimously affirmed without costs.

Since the angiogram procedure was initiated upon appellant’s recommendation assertedly without disclosing the risks thereof, and the fact that appellant’s associate admitted plaintiff to defendant hospital and ordered the test raise issues of fact as to appellant’s liability for the alleged acts of malpractice. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 A.D.2d 352, 595 N.Y.S.2d 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruno-v-albert-einstein-college-of-medicine-nyappdiv-1993.