Bruno Skirmont v. The Sheriff, Cook County, Illinois the Sheriff, Leavenworth, Kansas, Carl F. Zarter

Tenth Circuit

Bruno Skirmont v. The Sheriff, Cook County, Illinois the Sheriff, Leavenworth, Kansas, Carl F. Zarter

251 F.2d 869

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 22, 1958

Docket5761_1

StatusPublished

This text of 251 F.2d 869 (Bruno Skirmont v. The Sheriff, Cook County, Illinois the Sheriff, Leavenworth, Kansas, Carl F. Zarter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bruno Skirmont v. The Sheriff, Cook County, Illinois the Sheriff, Leavenworth, Kansas, Carl F. Zarter, 251 F.2d 869 (10th Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, an inmate of the Federal Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas, under an admittedly valid and subsisting sentence and judgment of the District Court of the Southern District of Texas, attacks the validity of detainers lodged with the respondent, Sheriff of Leavenworth, Kansas, by the Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois, under judgments and sentence by the Superior Court of Cook County. Inasmuch as the petitioner is now confined in the Federal Penitentiary under a valid and unexpired judgment of a federal court, it is conclusively sufficient to say that he is not legally entitled to the relief sought here. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, an inmate of the Federal Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas, under an admittedly valid and subsisting sentence and judgment of the District Court of the Southern District of Texas, attacks the validity of detainers lodged with the respondent, Sheriff of Leavenworth, Kansas, by the Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois, under judgments and sentence by the Superior Court of Cook County. Inasmuch as the petitioner is now confined in the Federal Penitentiary under a valid and unexpired judgment of a federal court, it is conclusively sufficient to say that he is not legally entitled to the relief sought here. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 F.2d 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruno-skirmont-v-the-sheriff-cook-county-illinois-the-sheriff-ca10-1958.