Bruno Kearney Architects, LLP v. Rose

New York Court of Appeals

Bruno Kearney Architects, LLP v. Rose

996 N.E.2d 904, 21 N.Y.3d 1053

DecidedSeptember 10, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 996 N.E.2d 904 (Bruno Kearney Architects, LLP v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bruno Kearney Architects, LLP v. Rose, 996 N.E.2d 904, 21 N.Y.3d 1053 (N.Y. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and judgment absolute dismissing the complaint granted upon plaintiffs stipulation. The Appellate Division correctly determined that plaintiff was not entitled to recovery against defendant.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Abdus-Salaam. Taking no part: Judge Rivera.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and judgment absolute dismissing the complaint granted upon plaintiffs stipulation. The Appellate Division correctly determined that plaintiff was not entitled to recovery against defendant.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Abdus-Salaam. Taking no part: Judge Rivera.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

996 N.E.2d 904, 21 N.Y.3d 1053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruno-kearney-architects-llp-v-rose-ny-2013.