Bruno Carmona v. State
This text of Bruno Carmona v. State (Bruno Carmona v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The State of TexasAppellee/s
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 25, 2014
No. 04-14-00218-CR
Bruno CARMONA, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009CR11004 Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding
ORDER Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel has informed the appellant of his right to file his own brief. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). If the appellant desires to file a pro se brief, he must do so within thirty days from the date of this order. See Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty days after the date the appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. It is further ORDERED that the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel, is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of the court.
_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 25th day of June, 2014.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bruno Carmona v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruno-carmona-v-state-texapp-2014.