Brunnier v. Hill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Brunnier v. Hill

85 So. 691, 204 Ala. 403, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 199

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 17, 1920·No. 1 Div. 134.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

Bill in equity for relief ■against a judgment at law. The agreement of counsel ¡-¡et up was not in writing, and ■was within the influence of circuit court rule Ij,, Code 1907, p. 1520. Collier v. Falk, 66 Ala. 223; Norman v. Burns, 67 Ala. 248; Hendley v. Chabert, 189 Ala. 258, 267, 65 South. 993; Evans v. Wilhite, 176 Ala. 287, 58 South. 262.

The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and ■SOMERVILLE, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMAS, J.

Bill in equity for relief ■against a judgment at law. The agreement of counsel ¡-¡et up was not in writing, and ■was within the influence of circuit court rule Ij,, Code 1907, p. 1520. Collier v. Falk, 66 Ala. 223; Norman v. Burns, 67 Ala. 248; Hendley v. Chabert, 189 Ala. 258, 267, 65 South. 993; Evans v. Wilhite, 176 Ala. 287, 58 South. 262.

The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and ■SOMERVILLE, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Brunnier v. Hill, 85 So. 691, 204 Ala. 403, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 199 (Ala. 1920).

Pincite

85 So. 691 (Brunnier v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related