Brunner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Brunner v. State

647 So. 2d 126, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3295, 1994 WL 114874

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brunner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 683 So. 2d 1129 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 6, 1994·No. No. 93-04336·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Candace Brunner appeals the summary denial of her motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The motion contained an oath signed by the appellant’s attorney rather than the appellant. See Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1993); Gorham v. State, 494 So.2d 211, 212 (Fla.1986). Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to the appellant’s refiling a properly sworn motion.

HALL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Candace Brunner appeals the summary denial of her motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The motion contained an oath signed by the appellant’s attorney rather than the appellant. See Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1993); Gorham v. State, 494 So.2d 211, 212 (Fla.1986). Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to the appellant’s refiling a properly sworn motion.

HALL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Brunner v. State, 647 So. 2d 126, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3295, 1994 WL 114874 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

647 So. 2d 126 (Brunner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related