Brunner v. Montgomery County Public Schools

Fourth Circuit

Brunner v. Montgomery County Public Schools

282 F. App'x 293

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2008·No. No. 08-1314·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pamela Brunner appeals the district court’s order dismissing her claims of employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brunner v. Montgomery County Pub. Sch., No: 1:06-cv-02336-JFM, 2008 WL 474402 (D.Md. Feb. 19, 2008). We deny Appellee’s motion to strike Brunner’s reply brief. We also deny Brunner’s motion to supplement her reply brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Pamela Brunner appeals the district court’s order dismissing her claims of employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brunner v. Montgomery County Pub. Sch., No: 1:06-cv-02336-JFM, 2008 WL 474402 (D.Md. Feb. 19, 2008). We deny Appellee’s motion to strike Brunner’s reply brief. We also deny Brunner’s motion to supplement her reply brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brunner v. Montgomery County Public Schools, 282 F. App'x 293 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

282 F. App'x 293 (Brunner v. Montgomery County Public Schools) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.