Brunner v. Diogenes Brewing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brunner v. Diogenes Brewing Co.

177 A.D. 927

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 177 A.D. 927 (Brunner v. Diogenes Brewing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brunner v. Diogenes Brewing Co., 177 A.D. 927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Others.—Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. But in substitution of the 21st finding of fact we find as follows: As against the plaintiffs, the tenant or any other person had no right to assign the certificate, or the right to abandon traffic pursuant thereto from the plaintiffs’ premises during the continuance of the certificate and the lease. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Others.—Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. But in substitution of the 21st finding of fact we find as follows: As against the plaintiffs, the tenant or any other person had no right to assign the certificate, or the right to abandon traffic pursuant thereto from the plaintiffs’ premises during the continuance of the certificate and the lease. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 A.D. 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brunner-v-diogenes-brewing-co-nyappdiv-1917.