Brunkard v. Brunkard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brunkard v. Brunkard

4 A.D.2d 953, 167 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4009

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 4 A.D.2d 953 (Brunkard v. Brunkard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brunkard v. Brunkard, 4 A.D.2d 953, 167 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4009 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for specific performance of an alleged contract for the purchase of real property, an order dated July 18, 1957 granted a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution, pursuant to section 181 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 156 of the Rules of Civil Practice, unless the action be noticed for trial for the next available term, in which case the motion was denied. That order was resettled by an order dated September 9, 1957 so as to make a recital omitted from the original order. The appeal is from said orders insofar as they deny the motion to dismiss the complaint in case the action is noticed for trial for the next available term. Order dated September 9, 1957 insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appeal from order dated July 18, 1957 dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for specific performance of an alleged contract for the purchase of real property, an order dated July 18, 1957 granted a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution, pursuant to section 181 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 156 of the Rules of Civil Practice, unless the action be noticed for trial for the next available term, in which case the motion was denied. That order was resettled by an order dated September 9, 1957 so as to make a recital omitted from the original order. The appeal is from said orders insofar as they deny the motion to dismiss the complaint in case the action is noticed for trial for the next available term. Order dated September 9, 1957 insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appeal from order dated July 18, 1957 dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.2d 953, 167 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brunkard-v-brunkard-nyappdiv-1957.