Brunita Lilly Frausto v. State
This text of Brunita Lilly Frausto v. State (Brunita Lilly Frausto v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILE COPY
COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AMARILLO
MANDATE THE STATE OF TEXAS
To the 64th District Court of Hale County, Greeting:
BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on December 23, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between
Brunita Lilly Frausto
v. No. 07-14-00382-CR And Trial Court No. A17707-0807
The State of Texas
was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:
Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated December 23, 2014, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that this appeal is dismissed.
Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that have been paid are adjudged.
It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that inasmuch as the appeal is dismissed at the appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.
oOo
WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed.
WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Amarillo on December 23, 2014.
Vivian Long VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brunita Lilly Frausto v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brunita-lilly-frausto-v-state-texapp-2014.